Digital Resistance

The rise of our digitally-focused world has given way to controversy, surveillance and revolutionaries. There are currently 3.17 billion people who have access to the internet, all of whom have differing freedoms and capabilities. As these numbers continue to grow and gain an understanding of how powerful this cyberspace is, the prominence of individual nodes will continue to influence.

Individual nodes is anyone and everyone within this digital sphere asserting their influence, opinion and critique. This is highlighted in the sharing of documents from Wikileaks, a non-profit website dedicated to leaking government and business-related information perceived to be in the “public’s interest”. The reason why i put public interest in quotation marks is that it is a deeply dividing topic that crosses the boundaries of national security, freedom of speech and both international and national legalities. The three most well known whistleblowers are Julian Assange, Bradley Manning and Edward Snowden; Assange being the founder of Wikileaks, Manning a US Army Private who leaked military secrets and Snowden who blew the lid off the National Security Agency (NSA) spying activities. It would be suffice to say that these three men, regardless of your position upon their activities, are examples of cyber-libertarians; for they promote the ideals of information freedom and have little regard for the State. And, like Libertarian and Presidential-candidate Rand Paul states;

However, these three men are alike in others ways besides their whistleblowing activities; all three capitalized upon the power of the digital age, utilising the internet to harness the powers of individual nodes and it’s respective abilities to reach out and promote the men’s ideals. Wikileaks would never exist without a computer and internet connections, as one does not need to imagine too hard to know that Assange would have a very tough time gaining attention had he published this all in a book.

Another assertion to the cyber-libertarianism of these men are the fact that they don’t see restrictions upon the internet and their ability to share information; they disregard it. Snowden for example sent secrets to The Guardian newspaper who effectively published them online, which allowed the information to contain further link-based sources and for the stories to be shared repeatedly via email, social media and blog posts. I feel however that Snowden, and even Assange, lose credibility for they chose to flee to places highly hypercritical of their beliefs and actions. Snowden fled to Russia and received amnesty, with much speculation regarding what he had to do, or share, with the Russians to gain this, as Russia is heavily authoritarian, far more so than the United States and United Kingdom. Assange too gained amnesty from The Republic of Ecuador embassy in London; Ecuador however is heavily strict and enforces violent and sometimes deadly actions on their own whistleblowers or government-opposers.

This begs the question; are these men, particularly Assange and Snowden doing the right thing, or have they served their initial ideals and have gone from freedom-fighters to hypocritical-hiders?

Let me know what you think,

Stay Classy UOW,

Todd Steele.



  1. Hi Todd,

    Very well written blog this week. I think your question at the end of your blog does have answer to both sides of the story. I found that this article on Assange explains both sides well, “To his supporters, Julian Assange is a valiant campaigner for truth. To his critics, he is a publicity-seeker who has endangered lives by putting a mass of sensitive information into the public domain.”

    I feel as though yes they have done important things through highlighting to the public the wrongs that have happened in our society and through the government, however on the flip side, lives have been endangered, and they have been able to basically get away with it without a huge punishment. Myself personally I’m not 100% how I feel about it – I think I lean more so to the positive aspect, as I feel that people use the internet to try and get away with things (especially governments clearly), when they should be held accountable.

    I think it is a never ending argument though which will see both sides being tossed around with no clear outcome being decided as both sides do have valid arguments.

    Thanks for your blog!

  2. I agree with charlotteolsen589^, there are so many blurred lines when it comes to the motives of each party which makes it hard to tell who is in the right or fighting for the people. I found a couple of spelling errors and double words just letting you know.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s